Please replied the below post ; introduction The summary will detail an explanat


Please replied the below post ;
introduction
The summary will detail an explanatory case study to explain the phenomena. The “how” and “why” questions are direct and explain the aspects of the study in a detailed manner (Yin, 2018). The cultural influence of a project manager and their impact on the risk system of the dynamic project requires an explanatory method to deal with investigate the case in light of the most suitable method. This study will utilize an explanatory case study technique which involved both a review risk system of the dynamic project some cause-effect relationships evaluate the aberrations during the formative long periods of the project managers and why some are more risk-averse. Explanatory case study research according to Olawumi & Chan (2019), is used to “compare with a set of variables to reach a specific outcome and noted that it starts with a specific aim, the interplay of the causal conditions, generation of data through perceptions and the proximity between cause and consequences and drawing of conclusion based on the identified mechanism that is sufficient and necessary for the research outcome.
Consultant’s Assessment/ Recommendations
A cause-and-effect relationship pattern will be the most appropriate approach to identify risk aversion in project managers. Yin (2018) states program rationale models can apply to an assortment of circumstances, for example, research on organizational change, in addition to those where a mediation is the subject of a case study. The key fixing is the guaranteed presence of a rehashed circumstances and logical results grouping of occasions, connected together. According to Van Looy & Devos (2019), The pattern-matching rationale was embraced to get recommendations from hypotheses and afterward contrasted them and case perceptions. As stated Khajehpour et al (2020), since the acquired patterns in design simply show the most often happened input data, the estimation records of these examples are additionally founded on their redundancy. The two models for estimating these standards are the support and confidence. To be sure, support is the proportion of the found rule rate over the entire existing guidelines. confidence is the proportion of the found guidelines to the found principles that have that precondition. One more suitable methodology for this case would be the Lean Six Sigma (LSS) technique since a strategy can dispose of likely unnecessary sources by distinguishing the
correlations of information to decide if the project managers might possibly be averse (George et al, 2004).
Conclusion
Case studies are utilized in design research to analyze a peculiarity, to create speculations, and to approve a strategy. the pattern matching technique identifies the influencing factors that make some project managers more risk-averse than others. The logic model was also an analytical strategy that observed the various events to compare them to future sequential events to reveal the solutions for reducing risks in the active project. The success of this case study depends on how well the researcher identifies the patterns and are applied as solutions for reducing risks. why some project managers are more risk-averse than others can be recognize by the patterns.
References
George, M. L., Maxey, J., Rowlands, D. T., Upton, M. (2004). The lean six sigma pocket toolbook: a quick reference guide to nearly 100 tools for improving quality and speed. [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from vbk://9780071505734
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2019). Development of a benchmarking model for BIM implementation in developing countries. Benchmarking : An International Journal, 26(4), 1210-1232. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2018-0138
Khajehpour, H., Sadatrasoul, S. M., & Zenouz, R. Y. (2020). Does Fundraising Have Meaningful Sequential Patterns? The Case of Fintech Startups. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 13(4), 763-790. https://doi.org/10.22059/jms.2020.299145.673994
Van Looy, A., & Devos, J. (2019). A roadmap for (un)successful BPM: Positivist case studies. Business Process Management Journal, 25(5), 1164-1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-04-2017-0083
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from vbk://9781506336183
instructions;
be sure to use current APA formatting for all elements of your Main Threads and your Replies. This should include Title Blocks, Headings, Citations, References, and general formatting.  The cover page must include this statement as an author’s note: “By submitting this assignment, I attest this submission represents my own work, and not that of another student, scholar, or internet source. I understand I am responsible for knowing and correctly utilizing referencing and bibliographical guidelines. I have not submitted this work for any other class.”
 In addition to the course textbook(s), this discussion must include at least 2 references from scholarly articles that have publication dates no older than 5 years. Do not use any books other than the Bible (if applicable) and the textbook. Do not conduct interviews.
 In-text citations are required to support your statements, points, assertions, issues, arguments, concerns, paragraph topic sentences, and statements of fact and opinion.


Leave a Reply